After reading this chapter I realized that a lot of the research and things that were in there are things that when I have observed higher grades I see going on in the classroom. Most of the teachers that I see doing writing use peer editing, author’s chair, and teacher conferencing. I think that this chapter makes some very good points. One point they make is that students must have good reading skills to be able to identify problems within their texts. If they do not have good comprehension then how are they going to know what they need to change when revising if they do not understand the context in which they need to write. I also think that elementary student have a hard time revising and writing at the same time and I agree that this is why we have to come up with steps and goals to help make it an easier transition into this. I also think that by making these steps and goals studnets are going to be more cautious and aware when they are revising, because they will have certain things they are looking for in their texts that need to be changed, they are not just aimlessly wondering through their paper not sure of what they are trying to fix.
I think that by combining a lot of the ideas that were proven to work in the research a teacher will get a more well rounded writing and revising program. I don’t think that just one thing can make a student good at revising. I think it is lots of practice and being shown many different ways to do it and different strategies to remember when revising. I also think that the teacher and peers play a major role. A person does not know how good their paper is until they hear feedback and I think it is important for a student to get feedback from peers their age and from the teacher. All these things will really help to make a paper the best that it can be.
